Access and data
We check auth flows, route protection, database access rules, role boundaries, private tables, and whether user data can be read by the wrong person.
A production readiness review finds the launch risks that do not show up in a demo: broken auth, exposed secrets, open database tables, missing migrations, fragile hosting, and no rollback plan.
A production readiness review checks whether the app can safely support real users, real data, and real workflows. It is different from a design critique or code style review because it focuses on the risks that can break a launch or expose customer data.
We check auth flows, route protection, database access rules, role boundaries, private tables, and whether user data can be read by the wrong person.
We look for client-shipped API keys, unsafe environment variables, webhook exposure, third-party billing risk, and missing service boundaries.
We review hosting, deployments, migrations, rollback paths, dependency risk, observability, error handling, and the steps needed before traffic arrives.
For founders, production readiness means the app is not just impressive in a demo. It can survive real users, real data, and real mistakes.
Automated scans are useful for public-surface checks. They cannot prove that private data is protected, that database policies are correct, or that a failed deploy can be rolled back.
The scorecard is the fast filter. It checks client-bundle key patterns, common private routes, Supabase/RLS signals, CORS, security headers, runtime errors, and secondary page quality signals.
Human review is needed when the app has logins, payments, internal dashboards, customer data, automated workflows, admin routes, file uploads, integrations, or anything expensive to break.
The output is a prioritized remediation plan. It separates launch blockers from cleanup tasks so founders do not waste engineering time on the wrong issues.